Know your Demons: Were Asuras really demons?
Asuras are referred to as demons in many Hindu and Buddhist
texts. But were they really demons? Or were they some sort of gods who got
interpreted as demons in later texts?
In Hinduism, Devas are termed as gods and Asuras are termed as
demons. But Asuras are defined differently in Vedic texts than in the Puranic
texts which came later. The Puranas term Asuras as those who didn’t get Sura,
meaning liquor, during the event of Samudra Manthan. But in Vedic
texts, Asura could mean any powerful personality, spirit, irrespective of being
good or bad. Many kings, sages and gods were referred to as Asuras. Gods like
Indra, Agni, Varuna, Mitra, and Rudra are termed Asuras in the earliest Vedic
texts.
So, Deva and Asura were in a sense synonymous before the split.
But in later Hindu texts Deva became gods and Asura became demons, and in
Zoroastrianism, Ahura became (true) gods and Daiva became demons (false gods). The patron deity of Assyria (in Mesopotamia) and personification of their
capital was named Assur. Even the Norse tribe of gods is named
Asir, which points towards a common Indo-European origin.
Therefore, some narrative that suggests that Asuras were
indigenous Dravidians is untrue. Also, there were some benevolent Asuras in the
Puranas, like Prahalad, Bali, and so on. Thus, being demonic binary is not true
for Hinduism. According to Mahabharata, the Chandravanshi Kshatriyas were all
descendants of Puru, who in turn was a son of Sharmishtha, an Asura princess.
This makes the Vedic elites like Purus, Bharatas and Kurus descendants of
Asuras. Thus, this Aryan-Dravidian binary is pointless.
Now that we have understood Asuras, let us know their subtypes.
Adityas: As I said, Indra, Mitra and other Adityas, son of goddess
Aditi were referred to as Asuras. This makes the Devas very much Asuras.
Daityas: Sons of Diti are called Daityas, and yes, they are the
demonic tribes mentioned in the Puranas. Hiranyaksha, Hiranyakashipu, Prahalad,
Virochana, and Bali belonged to this tribe.
Danavas: Sons of Danu called Danavas are another demonic sub-type
of Asuras. Many times, Daityas and Danavas are used synonymously. But that is
incorrect. Some of the famous Danavas were Vritra, Mayasura, Namuchi, Ilvala,
and Vatapi.
(If you consider the Celtic gods as sons of river goddess Danu,
they technically become Danavas too.)
Kalakeyas and NivÄtakavacas are the other
two subtypes of Asuras. But a lot is not known about them. But you must have
seen the Kalakeyas tribes in the Baahubali film franchise.
Another myth-busting is that Rakshasas are
not part of the Asura tribe. They are a type of monster independent of Asuras.
So, these were the subtypes of Asuras, who were gods for some
cultures (Norse, Assyrian, Zoroastrian), and demons for some (Hinduism,
Buddhism, Jainism). Or were they both as mentioned in the Rigveda?
Stay tuned for the blog on demons in Abrahamic cultures.
Comments
Post a Comment